I usually like Andrew Sullivan. But he goes a bit OCD on certain topics. Sarah Palin's baby was one of them. Obama's birth certificate is another.
To recap:
- The Hawaii governmental authorities have explained that they do electronic recordkeeping. Sullivan asks why they can't release the paper document.
- Now the Hawaii governmental authorities have released the paper document and the Obama people have let factcheck.org review it. Factcheck.org has explained that it's accurate and has all the appearances of a real document. Sullivan asks why factcheck.org is the only group that gets to review the document.
Seriously? Someone has to sit him down and explain the law of diminishing returns. If it's not enough to show it to one group, then do they have to let literally any person off the street come in and look? Does the document have to go on a roadtrip for those who can't afford to go to DC? What about non-Americans, do they have a right to see it too?
He's usually a smart guy but man, is he off his rocker here.
Posts
4 comments/complaints:
I could really care less...as I'm not a birther. But in a position of president of the USA...any semblance of privacy regarding their birth certificate should be overridden by the mandate the Constitution requires for the office.
Just my opinion. We could potentially have the same issue w/ McCain...depending on whether it was on a US base or not.
To be clear, Jamz is too cool to be a birther but applauds the endless scouring of this issue by the dissonant fringe.
In other words, you should get a free bowl of soup with a hat like that. It looks good on you, though.
LAFFO
Mich = Obama a$$ muncher. Maybe a white-guilter.......who knows.
Have a good one!
Obvious troll is obvious. 2.5/10
Post a Comment